Debt collection and criminal liability require separate assessment. The cheque’s formal requirements, presentation date and bank record of dishonour matter. Special enforcement for negotiable instruments may be available where its conditions are met; not every document qualifies.
Article 5 of Cheque Law No. 5941 provides, subject to its conditions and the holder’s complaint, a judicial fine of up to 1,500 days for each cheque. A ban on issuing cheques and opening cheque accounts is also relevant. Describing the ordinary sanction as a direct six-month to two-year prison sentence is incorrect. Enforcement and conversion of an unpaid judicial fine are governed by separate rules.
Responsibility depends on whether the account holder is an individual or company and, for companies, on responsibility for financial affairs. Not every shareholder or employee is automatically criminally liable. A criminal complaint does not replace debt-enforcement proceedings.
Review the cheque, bank endorsement, presentation records, endorsements, representation documents and payment evidence. Presentation, complaint, enforcement and objection periods differ and must be calculated separately. Payment and withdrawal of a complaint require assessment under Article 6 of the Cheque Law.
5941, Articles 5–6; Turkish Commercial Code cheque provisions
Legal information: This article provides general information on Turkish law. The documents, dates and applicable rules of each case require individual assessment.
Relationship across service hub, local pillar, subtopics and category articles
Abolition of Postponement of Bankruptcy and Concordat: Application Process
The former postponement-of-bankruptcy institution was abolished in 2018 by Law No. 7101. It must not be presented as an available route for new applications. Transitional rules may matter for older proceedings. Concordat is a separate restructuring procedure with its own conditions and effects.
Read ArticleObjection Annulment Lawsuit: Process and Considerations in Turkey
Under Article 67 of the Enforcement and Bankruptcy Law, this action seeks to continue non-judgment enforcement stayed by the debtor’s objection. It is not an appeal against a court judgment. The creditor must establish the underlying debt under the general rules of evidence.
Read ArticleThe former postponement-of-bankruptcy institution was abolished in 2018 by Law No. 7101. It must not be presented as an available route for new applications. Transitional rules may matter for older proceedings. Concordat is a separate restructuring procedure with its own conditions and effects.
Bankruptcy LawUnder Article 67 of the Enforcement and Bankruptcy Law, this action seeks to continue non-judgment enforcement stayed by the debtor’s objection. It is not an appeal against a court judgment. The creditor must establish the underlying debt under the general rules of evidence.
Need legal advice and representation on the topic you just read about?
Our attorneys are ready to help. Free initial consultation.
Get notified about new legal articles